The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads in part:
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside."
Babies born to illegal alien mothers within U.S. borders are called anchor babies because under the 1965 immigration Act, they act as an anchor that pulls the illegal alien mother and eventually a host of other relatives into permanent U.S. residency. (Jackpot babies is another term).
The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 to protect the rights of native-born Black Americans, whose rights were being denied as recently-freed slaves. In 1866, Senator Jacob Howard clearly spelled out the intent of the 14th Amendment by writing:
"Every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."
The original intent of the 14th Amendment was clearly not to facilitate illegal aliens defying U.S. law at taxpayer expense. Current estimates indicate there may be over 300,000 anchor babies born each year in the U.S., thus causing illegal alien mothers to add more to the U.S. population each year than immigration from all sources in an average year before 1965.
The correct interpretation of the 14th Amendment is that an illegal alien mother is subject to the jurisdiction of her native country, as is her baby.
Over a century ago, the Supreme Court correctly confirmed this restricted interpretation of citizenship in the so-called 'Slaughter-House cases' [83 US 36 (1873)] and in [112 US 94 (1884)]. In Elk v.Wilkins, the phrase 'subject to its jurisdiction' excluded from its operation 'children of ministers, consuls, and citizens of foreign states born within the United States.' In Elk, the American Indian claimant was considered not an American citizen because the law required him to be 'not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction and owing them direct and immediate allegiance.'
Congress subsequently passed a special act to grant full citizenship to American Indians, who were not citizens even through they were born within the borders of the United States. The Citizens Act of 1924, codified in 8USCSß1401, provides that:
The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
(a) a person born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
(b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe.
American citizens must be wary of elected politicians voting to illegally extend our generous social benefits to illegal aliens and other criminals.[1]
__________________________
[1] http://www.theamericanresistance.com/issues/anchor_babies.html
So, this is so outrageous, that I simply must post this blog without any further fanfare.
Well, when you think the bullshit coming from this administration is as bad as it can possibly get ... wait a minute and take a look at Marmara Manhattan Hotel; offering ANCHOR BABY Birth Packages to people who want to open the "doorway" for future immigration. I don't call it a doorway ... I call it a toxic floodgate into the US that will far exceed the muck and crap coming from the uncapped oil lead in the Gulf. And who is offering this "birth package?" A Turkish hotel chain. Why are we even letting them open a chain in the US? Last time I heard, we weren't that tight with Turkey. And why haven't we or our government closed this stupid loophole in our Constitution?
Anchor babies aren't allowed in any modern, developed, industrial, or civilized nation except for the United States. Are they so much more stupid and ignorant than we? Or are we just so much smarter? Unfortunately, I believe that we may not be that smart. And if you haven't seen my earlier blog: "May I see your papers please!" you may want to read it under "older posts."
The big question is, which of the two massive immigrant groups will win out? the Mexicans or the Muslims? A beheading by either or stoning under Shari'a law? No thanks, I think I'll pass!
I know, I know.. you think I'm full of sh*t... well, I'm not... I couldn't even begin to make this much stuff up!!
Marmara Manhattan Hotel
301 East 94th Street
New York, NY 10128
(212) 427-3100
http://www.themarmarahotels.com/news2.asp?cat=21&subcat=66 Look under "Packages" offered.
NOW, DO YOU GET IT YET?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment